I went to see 300 the other day. The theater was packed, as I gather the thing was well advertised. There were a lot of kids there too, which always bugs me, since there is a lot of graphic violence involved. I have always liked the story of Thermopolae Pass, and I have been a fan of Frank Miller's work for awhile. I even watched the old version of the 300 Spartans (1960s) awhile back to get ready for this one.
I liked the film a lot for the graphics, and the over-the-top nature of the battle. The original story was written like a myth or legend and the film keeps true to a lot of it. I would have liked to have a little more back story, about why the Spartans were needed at that particular moment, i.e., to slow the advance of the Persians so the Athenian navy could get ready.
The film focuses mostly on the battle itself, which does again follow the original storyline better than the 1960s film. King Leonidis serves as their leader during the battle, and was fun for me to watch. He appeared to be modeled after a greek statue, so he looked the part. The dialogue was campy, but so was the rest of the film. It is weird that you never see all 300 in one spot, more like 12-15 at a time, and it always seems like the same 15 on the front line, including Leonidas himself.
ther battle scenes were well filmed in a sepia tone, and well over the top. It looked like there were a lot of leftover creatures from Lord of the Rings that they plugged into the breach to try to dislodge the 300 from their pass. Xerxes was like eight feet tall and somewhat effiminate.
It appeared the movie had an agenda to put forth. It pitted the 300 crazy white and buff warriors against the homosexual, gay, black, grotesque horde. The folks back home, who didn't seem to support the war because of a religious festival, went on and on about freedom, but at the same time, were bought off by the flaming black and grotesque horde. I tried to frame it in the context of modern day America, and the pieces didn't fit very well. Maybe I was trying to read too much into it.
The thing I really like about the story is the aspect of dying for a cause against insurmountable odds. Stories like the Alamo and Masada have always fascinated me, partly because they are historical, partly because it is interesting that these people didn't give in. I understand it was to save the greek way of life, but I just wish they had made the cause for dying more clear.
Some lingering questions I have about it:
Why does a king need a senate?
At the end, why does he go for a head shot on Xerxes when he could have clearly gone for a kill? He was close enough and had ample time to prepare this shot, and he was really good with a spear.
How did those old guys get up on that oracle place?
Was that Faramir?